Diagnose the system
Surface the business need, learner reality, and conditions shaping performance.
A practical framework for connecting business priorities, human performance, learning experience, and measurable impact.
Original framework by Melody Maples
This framework reflects a systems-oriented approach to learning strategy: begin with the performance shift, understand the conditions surrounding it, and design an experience that can transfer into meaningful action.
It is intended for discovery, stakeholder facilitation, portfolio and program planning, workforce enablement, and the early shaping of learning initiatives across industries.
Each move answers a different question. Together, they keep learning anchored in performance, supported in context, and responsive to evidence.
Surface the business need, learner reality, and conditions shaping performance.
Translate the opportunity into a coherent pathway, not a collection of content.
Build the support, ownership, and operating conditions that turn learning into action.
Use meaningful signals to understand reach, application, impact, and needed adaptation.
Select a phase to reveal the questions, inputs, and design moves that matter most.
Surface the business need, learner reality, and conditions shaping performance.
Intended outcomeA shared, evidence-based definition of the opportunity.
What business outcome must learning help move?
Where does performance break down today?
What conditions enable or constrain transfer?
Use these principles as decision rules when priorities compete or the work becomes complex.
Define the business and human performance shift first. Content is one possible response—not the automatic answer.
The blueprint creates a shared line of sight from an initial request to the broader conditions required for performance.
Clarify what people need to do differently and why it matters now—before defining a solution.
Use the four phases to uncover assumptions, evidence, audience needs, support conditions, and ownership.
Select the design moves that matter most and make gaps or dependencies visible to the group.
Capture readiness, priorities, and open questions as the foundation for a strategy brief or project plan.
I would use the framework as a guided discovery tool—not a rigid sequence. Stakeholder input, performance evidence, and organizational context determine where we spend time. The goal is shared clarity about the need, the surrounding system, and the most valuable next step.
A cross-industry example: supporting adoption of a new AI-enabled workflow.
“We need training on the new AI tool.”
“Employees need to recognize when the AI-enabled workflow adds value, use it effectively, verify its output, and apply sound judgment to the final decision.”
Identify priority use cases, current barriers, role differences, risk points, and the conditions influencing trust and adoption.
Create role-relevant pathways with realistic scenarios, guided practice, output evaluation, and increasing complexity.
Equip leaders, embed workflow guidance, clarify responsible-use expectations, and make help available at the moment of need.
Track adoption, quality, confidence, and business impact to refine the experience and determine where to scale.
The learning solution becomes one part of a connected adoption strategy—aligned to real work, supported by leaders and tools, and improved through evidence.
Capture an opportunity, assess where the system stands, and leave with a focused set of priorities.
How developed are the conditions around this learning need?
No priorities selected yet.
Explore the framework